4.7 Article

Biocompatibility and structural characterization of glycosaminoglycans isolated from heads of silver-banded whiting (Sillago argentifasciata Martin & Montalban 1935)

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.160

关键词

Glycosaminogjycans; Silver-banded whiting; Chondroitin sulfates; Hyaluronic acid; Biocompatibility

资金

  1. USAID STRIDE - CARWIN (United States Agency for International Development Science, Technology, Research and Innovation for Development -Collaborative Applied Researchwith Industry) program [0213997-G-2015-012-00, 0213997-G2015-012-05]
  2. Matsumae International Fellowship Program (2019-2020)
  3. University of Mississippi
  4. American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy 2019 New Investigator Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) were extracted from heads of silver-banded whiting (SBW) fish and subjected to preliminary biocompatibility testing per ISO 10993: intracutaneous irritation, maximization sensitization, systemic toxicity, and cytotoxicity. When the GAG solution was injected intradermally. the observed irritation was within ISO limits and comparable to a marketed control. There was no evidence of sensitization, systemic toxicity, or cellular toxicity on the test organisms treated with the GAG mixture from SOW fish heads. Fractionation by size-exclusion chromatography has shown three distinct fractions: F1 as low molecular weight hyaluronic acid (190 kDa), 12 (82 kDa) and F3 (64 kDa ), both as chondroitin sulfates. Structural characterization by 1D and 2D nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and disaccharide analysis have shown sulfation ratios at positions C4:C6 of the 12 and F3 fractions respectively as 70:20% and 50:30%, and the balance of non-sulfated and 4,6-di-sulfated units. The preliminary results here suggest that GAG-based extracts from SBW fish heads are suitable alternative products to be used in soft tissue augmentation, although further long-term biocompatibility studies are still required. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据