4.7 Article

Formation and physicochemical properties of amyloid fibrils from soy protein

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.258

关键词

Soy protein isolate; Amyloid-like fibrils; Protein hydrolysate; Hydrolysate incubation; Physicochemical properties

资金

  1. Ningbo University of Technology (NBUT), China at Kansas State University (KSU), USA
  2. Department of Grain Science and Industry of KSU
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51703100]
  4. Ningbo Natural Science Foundation [2018A610098]
  5. Project Program of Fenghua Institute Science and Technology [FHI-018112]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amyloid-like fibrils from food proteins possess unique functional properties for food and many other uses. This study reports the effect of hydrolytic heating (pH 2.0, 85 degrees C, 0-24 h) and incubation times (0-7 days) on the formation and physicochemical properties of amyloid fibrils based on soy protein isolates (SPI). The SPI hydrolysates and fibrils were characterized through AFM, Thioflavin T (ThT) fluorescence, SDS-PAGE, FTIR, solubility, particle size, and DSC. Stable amyloid-like protein fibrils were formed with 8-10 h of hydrolytic heating at 85 degrees C followed by 3 days of incubation at room temperature, as observed under AFM and confirmed with ThT assay. The fibrils contained significantly higher amounts of regular secondary structures than 21. Incubation of the hydrolysates led to a slight increase of average particle sizes. Protein solubility near the isoelectric point (approximately pH 4.8) increased with longer hydrolytic heating (0-24 h). The hydrolysates and fibrils exhibited better gelling properties than the SPI. The DSC results revealed that hydrolysates from longer hydrolytic heating times (12 and 24 h) possessed stronger aggregation potential during heat treatment. This study provides useful information to manipulate the formation of protein fibrils and will benefit future research to explore their potential applications. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据