4.6 Article

Influence of vibration parameters on ultrasonic elliptical vibration cutting of reaction-bonded silicon carbide

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-05420-9

关键词

Reaction-bonded silicon carbide; Machinability; Ultrasonic elliptical vibration cutting; Vibration parameters; Finite element simulation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)-German Research Foundation (DFG) International Joint Research Programme [51761135106]
  2. Heavy-duty Intelligent Manufacturing Equipment Innovation Center of Hebei Province
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. Science Challenge Project [TZ2018006-0201-02, TZ2018006-0205-02]
  5. Open Research Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology in Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China [DMETKF 2018007, DMETKF2019016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reaction-bonded silicon carbide (RB-SiC) possesses a low machinability due to its hard-brittle characteristics, as well as the poor synergetic deformation behavior between different phases. In the present work, we perform finite element simulations to explore ultrasonic elliptical vibration cutting (UEVC) of RB-SiC using single crystalline diamond tool, with an emphasis on its dependence on utilized vibration parameters. Corresponding UEVC experiments using the same machining and material parameters with the simulations are also carried out to verify the prediction results. Simulation and experimental results reveal individual tool-particle interactions, as well as their correlations with machining force and machined surface quality. It is found that the frequency and amplitude of the two-dimensional vibrations have important influences on the cutting processes. And optimized values of vibration frequency and vibration amplitudes along both cutting direction and depth of cut direction for achieving rationalized cutting performance of RB-SiC by applying the UEVC are found.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据