4.4 Article

Expression of the hybrid bacteriocin Ent35-MccV in Lactococcus lactis and its use for controlling Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli in milk

期刊

INTERNATIONAL DAIRY JOURNAL
卷 104, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2020.104650

关键词

-

资金

  1. CONICET [PIP 0906CO]
  2. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica [PICT 4610, 3776]
  3. Universidad Nacional de Salta [CIUNSa 2530/0]
  4. Secretaria de Ciencia, Arte e Innovacion Tecnologica - Universidad Nacional de Tucuman (SCAIT-UNT) [PIUNT D641/1]
  5. Xunta de Galicia [10PXIB261045PR]
  6. Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology [AGL2010-19646]
  7. USC-Santander fellowships
  8. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity [IPT-2011-1290-010000]
  9. European Regional Development Fund 2007-2013 (FEDER) [IPT-2011-1290-010000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacteriocins are antimicrobial peptides synthesised ribosomally. One of the main drawbacks of bacteriocins as food biopreservative agents is their restricted action spectrum. To obtain a broad-spectrum bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacterium, we engineered a fusion protein between the enterocin P signal peptide and the broad-spectrum chimerical bacteriocin Ent35-MccV. Lactococcus lactis NZ9000 transformed with the recombinant plasmid (pRUK) was tested to identify the bacteriocin production by antimicrobial activity and colony MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Additionally, we performed mixed cultures in skim milk to determine the inhibition of Lc. lactis NZ9000 (pRUK) on both Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli strains isolated from food. The results showed that Lc. lactis NZ9000 (pRUK) was able to diminish the growth of both L monocytogenes and E. coli in skim milk due to Ent35-MccV production. Ent35-MccV is the first linear, genetically engineered bacteriocin produced in situ in food products used effectively to control Gram-negative and Gram-positive foodborne pathogens. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据