4.5 Article

Synthesis, crystal structure, and BSA binding studies of new Co(II) and Ni(II) complexes of 2-(hydroxymethyl)-1H-imidazole-4,5-dicarboxylate

期刊

INORGANICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 505, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2020.119469

关键词

Co(II) complex; Ni(II) complex; Crystal structure; Interaction with BSA; Fluorescence quenching; Thermodynamic parameter; Synchronous fluorescence

资金

  1. Program for the key scientific research project of colleges and universities in Henan Province [16A350002]
  2. Henan Province basic and frontier technology research projects [152300410214]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two new complexes [Co(H(3)hmIDC)(2)(H2O)(2)]center dot 3H(2)O (1) and [Ni(H(3)hmIDC)(2)(H2O)(2)] (2), where H(4)hmIDC = 2-(hydroxymethyl)-1H-imidazole-4,5-dicarboxylic acid, have been synthesized and characterized by analytical and spectral techniques. X-ray single crystal diffraction shows that both complexes possess mononuclear structure, but the detail structures are different. Complex 1 belongs to triclinic space group P-1, while 2 belongs to the monoclinic space group P2(1)/c. The mechanism of interaction between the complexes and bovine serum albumin (BSA) were examined by fluorescence emission spectra. The results indicated that the fluorescence intensity of BSA was decreased considerably upon the addition of the complexes through a static quenching mechanism with formation of one binding site. The associated changes in enthalpy and entropy indicating that hydrogen bonding and van der Waals forces were the dominant intermolecular forces for BSA-complex 1 binding system, and hydrophobic interactions was the dominant intermolecular forces for BSA-complex 2 binding system. Furthermore, the effects of the complexes upon the conformation of BSA were analyzed using synchronous fluorescence spectrum and the results showed that the interaction of complex 1 or 2 with BSA affected the conformation of tryptophan residue and then affected the conformation of BSA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据