4.7 Article

Blockchain-based fair payment smart contract for public cloud storage auditing

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 519, 期 -, 页码 348-362

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.01.051

关键词

Blockchain; Smart contract; Public auditing; Fair payment; Cloud storage

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61602287, 61802235, 61672330, 61702168]
  2. Primary Research & Development Plan of Shandong Province [2018GGX101037]
  3. Major Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Shandong Province [2018CXGC0702]
  4. Development and Construction Funds Project of National Independent Innovation Demonstration Zone in Shandong Peninsula [5190101010001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cloud storage plays an important role in today's cloud ecosystem. Increasingly clients tend to outsource their data to the cloud. In spite of its copious advantages, integrity has always been a significant issue. The audit method is commonly used to ensure integrity in cloud scenarios. However, traditional auditing schemes expect a third-party auditor (TPA), which is not always available in the real world. Also, the former scheme implies a limited pay-as-you-go service, as it requires the client to pay for the service in advance. In this paper, we aim to address the aforementioned drawback by adopting blockchain to replace TPA and designing a blockchain-based fair payment smart contract for public cloud storage auditing. In our system, data owner and cloud service provider (CSP) will run a blockchain-based smart contract. The contract ensures that the CSP is required to submit data possession proof regularly. The CSP gets paid only if the verification is passed; otherwise, it gets no remuneration but has to pay the penalties. To reduce the number of interactions in the execution of contract, we present the notion of non-interactive public provable data possession and design a blockchain-based smart contract for public cloud storage auditing based on this primitive. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据