4.7 Article

An approach for measuring semantic similarity between Wikipedia concepts using multiple inheritances

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102188

关键词

Semantic similarity; Multiple inheritance; Information content; Wikipedia category graph; Knowledge graph

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61772210, U1911201]
  2. Guangdong Province Universities Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme (2018)
  3. Project of Science and Technology in Guangzhou in China [201807010043]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wikipedia provides a huge collaboratively made semi-structured taxonomy called Wikipedia category graph (WCG), which can be utilized as a Knowledge Graph (KG) to measure the semantic similarity (SS) between Wikipedia concepts. Previously, several Most Informative Common Ancestor-based (MICA-based) SS methods have been proposed by intrinsically manipulating the taxonomic structure of WCG. However, some basic structural issues in WCG such as huge size, branching factor and multiple inheritance relations hamper the applicability of traditional MICA-based and multiple inheritance-based approaches in it. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a solution to handle these structural issues and present a new multiple inheritance-based SS approach, called Neighborhood Ancestor Semantic Contribution (NASC). In this approach, firstly, we define the neighborhood of a category (a taxonomic concept in WCG) to define its semantic space. Secondly, we describe the semantic value of a category by aggregating the intrinsic IC-based semantic contribution weights of its semantically relevant multiple ancestors. Thirdly, based on our approach, we propose six different methods to compute the SS between Wikipedia concepts. Finally, we evaluate our methods on gold standard word similarity benchmarks for English, German, Spanish and French languages. The experimental evaluation demonstrates that the proposed NASC-based methods remarkably outperform traditional MICA-based and multiple inheritance-based approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据