4.5 Article

Elevated concentrations of terrestrial radionuclides in sand: An essential raw material used in Bangladeshi dwellings

期刊

INDOOR AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT
卷 30, 期 8, 页码 1051-1061

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1420326X20924835

关键词

Sand; gamma-Ray spectrometry; Terrestrial radionuclides; Radiation hazard; Dose rate; Excess lifetime cancer risk

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found elevated concentrations of terrestrial radionuclides in sand widely used in the construction industry in Bangladesh, potentially posing radiation hazards to dwellers. Precautionary measures need to be taken to ensure safety when using sand for construction and decorative purposes.
Sand is one of the main materials used in the construction industry. Elevated concentrations of terrestrial radionuclides in sand may cause great harm to dwellers. Present study determines concentrations of terrestrial radionuclides in sand that is widely used as a raw material in the construction industry in Bangladesh, via conventional HPGe gamma-ray spectrometry. The average activity concentrations of Ra-226, Th-232 and K-40 in the analysed samples were found as 36.8 +/- 3.9, 58.9 +/- 6.0 and 755 +/- 91 Bqkg(-1) in Base sand, 68.1 +/- 5.3, 185.7 +/- 9.9 and 1032 +/- 104 Bqkg(-1) in Sylhet sand, and 38.1 +/- 3.6, 74.7 +/- 5.9 and 636 +/- 77 Bqkg(-1) in Aster sand. All data show relatively higher values than the world average of 35, 30, 400 Bqkg(-1), respectively. Key hazard parameters were estimated to realize the radiation effects on human health due to the use of sand as construction and building materials. The estimated parameters for Sylhet sand show relatively higher values than the population-weighted world average values, prescribed by regulatory bodies. Results show that the Sylhet sand may pose a significant radiation hazard to the dwellers via prolonged exposure, and necessary precautionary steps need to be taken to ensure safe dwellings while using this sand for construction and decorative purposes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据