4.7 Article

Adaptive Resource Allocation in Future Wireless Networks With Blockchain and Mobile Edge Computing

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 1689-1703

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2019.2956519

关键词

Wireless networks; Resource management; Computational modeling; Task analysis; Adaptive systems; Mobile edge computing; computation offloading; blockchain; deep reinforcement learning

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61671088, 61771070]
  2. Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (BUPT) Excellent Ph.D.
  3. Students Foundation [CX2018201]
  4. Canadian Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council [RGPIN-2019-06348]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we present a blockchain-based mobile edge computing (B-MEC) framework for adaptive resource allocation and computation offloading in future wireless networks, where the blockchain works as an overlaid system to provide management and control functions. In this framework, how to reach a consensus between the nodes while simultaneously guaranteeing the performance of both MEC and blockchain systems is a major challenge. Meanwhile, resource allocation, block size, and the number of consecutive blocks produced by each producer are critical to the performance of B-MEC. Therefore, an adaptive resource allocation and block generation scheme is proposed. To improve the throughput of the overlaid blockchain system and the quality of services (QoS) of the users in the underlaid MEC system, spectrum allocation, size of the blocks, and number of producing blocks for each producer are formulated as a joint optimization problem, where the time-varying wireless links and computation capacity of the MEC servers are considered. Since this problem is intractable using traditional methods, we resort to the deep reinforcement learning approach. Simulation results show the effectiveness of the proposed approach by comparing with other baseline methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据