4.7 Article

Joint Impact of I/Q Imbalance and Imperfect CSI on SM-MIMO Systems Over Generalized Beckmann Fading Channels: Optimal Detection and Cramer-Rao Bound

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
卷 19, 期 5, 页码 3034-3046

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2020.2970002

关键词

Cramer-Rao bound; generalized Beckmann fading; I; Q imbalance; optimal ML detection; spatial modulation

资金

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) BIDEB2214 International Doctoral Research Fellowship Programme
  2. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [218E035]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spatial modulation (SM) has been shown to be a promising low-complexity alternative to the state-of-art multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) schemes due to its novel transmission approach. This paper investigates the performance of SM-MIMO systems in the presence of two practical undesirable effects, namely in-phase (I) and quadrature-phase (Q) imbalance (IQI) and imperfect channel state information (ICSI). An optimum maximum likelihood detection (MLD) method is proposed to tackle the effects of self-interference and signal distortion caused by IQI impairment by adapting the traditional MLD technique in accordance with the asymmetric characteristics of the IQI. More particularly, upper-bounds of the closed-form average pairwise error probability (APEP) and the average bit error rate (ABER) are derived for generalized Beckmann fading channels. As erroneously interpreted channel coefficients at the receiver (Rx) cause the error rate to increase and the detection to fall short, Cramer-Rao bound, which is a lower bound on the variance of the channel estimator, is utilized to assess the estimation accuracy. The system performance is evaluated by analytical derivations that are corroborated with computer simulations. The obtained results show that ICSI and IQI should be seriously considered while designing the future SM-based wireless communication systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据