4.7 Article

Modeling Strategic Behaviors of Renewable Energy With Joint Consideration on Energy and Tradable Green Certificate Markets

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 1898-1910

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2953114

关键词

Renewable energy sources; Generators; Power systems; Uncertainty; Green products; Analytical models; Investment; Electricity Market; Tradable Green Certificate; Strategic Behavior; Market Equilibrium; Mathematical Problem with Equilibrium Constraints (MPEC)

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [51537005]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1766212]
  3. State Grid [U1766212]
  4. National Young Talent Support Program by Ministry of Science of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Renewable energy will become a normal energy source and will be required to participate in the market. The renewable portfolio standards (RPS) together with tradable green certificates (TGC) are considered as an appropriate market mechanism to help recover renewable energy investments. The strategic offering behaviors of renewable energy should be carefully studied, especially with the introduction of TGC. This paper proposed a market equilibrium model with joint consideration on energy and TGC. The model includes two-stages of day-ahead and real-time analysis, to formulate the complex decision processes of strategic renewable energy. The model is built in a bilevel format, with multiple-scenario settings to consider the uncertainty of renewable power output within a day. Then, the bilevel model is reformulated as a single-level nonlinear problem based on KKT theorems. Then, the nonlinearities are linearized based on the strong duality theorem and a binary expansion method. The model has been finally transformed as a mix integer linear problem. Finally, an illustrative example is proposed to analyze the strategic offering behaviors of renewable energy under various market situations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据