4.7 Article

Dense Dilated Network With Probability Regularized Walk for Vessel Detection

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
卷 39, 期 5, 页码 1392-1403

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2019.2950051

关键词

Feature extraction; Retinal vessels; Image segmentation; Diseases; Blood vessels; Biomedical imaging; Vessel segmentation; encoder-decoder; deep learning; regularized walk; vessel reconnection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61773297, 61601029]
  2. Open Fund of Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing and Real-Time Industrial System [2016ZNSS01A]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation [LZ19F010001]
  4. Grant of Ningbo 3315 Innovation Team

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The detection of retinal vessel is of great importance in the diagnosis and treatment of many ocular diseases. Many methods have been proposed for vessel detection. However, most of the algorithms neglect the connectivity of the vessels, which plays an important role in the diagnosis. In this paper, we propose a novel method for retinal vessel detection. The proposed method includes a dense dilated network to get an initial detection of the vessels and a probability regularized walk algorithm to address the fracture issue in the initial detection. The dense dilated network integrates newly proposed dense dilated feature extraction blocks into an encoder-decoder structure to extract and accumulate features at different scales. A multi-scale Dice loss function is adopted to train the network. To improve the connectivity of the segmented vessels, we also introduce a probability regularized walk algorithm to connect the broken vessels. The proposed method has been applied on three public data sets: DRIVE, STARE and CHASE_DB1. The results show that the proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and also area under receiver operating characteristic curve.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据