4.8 Article

Health-Aware Multiobjective Optimal Charging Strategy With Coupled Electrochemical-Thermal-Aging Model for Lithium-Ion Battery

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 3417-3429

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2019.2935326

关键词

Batteries; Mathematical model; Electrolytes; Aging; Electrodes; Degradation; Solids; Battery degradation; electrochemical-thermal-aging model; health-aware optimal charge; lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery; lithium plating; multiobjective; solid-electrolyte-interphase (SEI) growth; temperature rise

资金

  1. National Key R&D Plan Key Special Project [2017YFE0102000]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [16510711500]
  3. Shanghai E propulsion Auto Technology Company, Ltd. [16510711500]
  4. National Nature Science Foundation of China [5167718]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Battery fast charging strategies have gained an increasing interest toward the convenience of battery applications but may unduly degrade or damage the batteries. To harness these competing objectives, including safety, lifespan, and charging time, in this article, we propose a novel health-aware multiobjective optimal charging strategy to simultaneously shorten the charging time and relieve the battery degradation. The multiobjective optimal charging problem is formulated based on a coupled electrochemical-thermal-aging battery model. Constraints are explicitly imposed on physically meaningful state variables to avoid hazardous operations. Charging duration and battery aging process are well traded-off. Strategies for minimum-time and health-aware fast charging are investigated using different input current bounds, subject to both side reaction and temperature constraints. The experimental results validate that the presented multiobjective health-aware optimal charging algorithm is capable of reducing the charging time from its benchmarks largely without sacrificing the state-of-health of the battery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据