4.7 Article

Evolutionary Collaborative Human-UAV Search for Escaped Criminals

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TEVC.2019.2925175

关键词

Search problems; Collaboration; Unmanned aerial vehicles; Path planning; Optimization; Planning; Collaborative human-unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) search; criminal search and capture; discrete-time optimization; evolutionary algorithms (EAs); hybrid algorithm

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61872123, U1509207, 61473263]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB1305200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for target searching in complex environments has increased considerably in recent years. The numerous studies on UAV search methods have been reported, but few have been conducted on collaborative human-UAV search which is common in many applications. In this paper, we present a problem of collaborative human-UAV search for escaped criminals, the aim of which is to minimize the expected time of capture rather than detection. We show that our problem is much more complex than the problem of pure UAV search. The difficulty of our problem is further increased by the fact that criminals will attempt to avoid detection and capture. To solve the problem, we propose a hybrid evolutionary algorithm (EA) that uses three evolutionary operators, namely, comprehensive learning, variable mutation, and local search, to efficiently explore the solution space. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms some well-known EAs and other popular UAV search methods on test instances. An application of our method to a real-world operation took 311 min to capture a criminal who had escaped for over three days, validating its practicability and performance advantage. This paper provides a good basis for promoting the application of EAs to a wider class of man-machine collaboration scheduling problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据