4.7 Article

Chemically synthesized Ag-doped SnS films for PV applications

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 42, 期 16, 页码 19027-19035

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.09.059

关键词

SnS films; Ag-doping; Chemical bath deposition; PV application

资金

  1. New & Renewable Energy Core Technology Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea [20143030011950]
  2. Human Resource Training Program for Regional Innovation and Creativity through the Ministry of Education
  3. Human Resources Development Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant - Korean Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) [20124030200100]
  4. Human Resource Training Program for Regional Innovation and Creativity through the National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2014H1C1A1066809]
  5. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20143030011950] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present paper reports chemically synthesized silver (Ag)-doped SnS absorbers (0-15 at%) with tunable opto-electrical properties. The deposide films exhibited a polycrystalline nature and the crystallinity was improved with Ag-doping concentration upto 9 at%. The optical band gap of the films was varied in the range, 1.31-1.26 eV. The electrical resistivity of the films decreased significantly and the carrier concentration was improved by the Ag-doping concentration. Therefore, the SnS films grown with a 9 at% Ag-doping concentration exhibited a very low electrical resistivity of 6 Omega-cm and a carrier concentration of 1.2x10(16) cm(-3) with an optical energy band gap of 1.26 eV due to the interstitial inclusion of Ag-atoms, which are suitable for the fabrication of eco-friendly, low cost, reliable, and highly efficient thin film solar cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据