4.6 Article

An Automatic Method for the Segmentation and Classification of Imminent Labor Contraction From Electrohysterograms

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 67, 期 4, 页码 1133-1141

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2930618

关键词

Pregnancy; Electrodes; Biomedical measurement; Correlation; Feature extraction; Sociology; Electrohysterogram; non-linear correlation analysis; Gaussian mixture model

资金

  1. SAFEpregnancy@Home EUROSTARS funding [10608]
  2. BMBI UMR7338 laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Preterm birth is the first cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Despite continuous clinical routine improvements, the preterm rate remains steady. Moreover, the specificity of the early diagnosis stays poor as many hospitalized women for preterm delivery threat finally deliver at term. In this context, the use of electrohysterograms may increase the sensitivity and the specificity of early diagnosis of preterm labor. Methods: This paper proposes a clinical application of electrohysterogram processing for the classification of patients as prone to deliver within a week or later. The approach relies on non-linear correlation analysis for the contraction bursts extraction and uses computation of various features combined with the use of Gaussian mixture models for their classification. The method is tested on a new dataset of 68 records collected on women hospitalized for preterm delivery threat. Results: This paper presents promising results for the automatic segmentation of the contraction and a classification sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of, respectively, 80.7%, 76.3%, and 76.2%. Conclusion: These results are in accordance with the gold standards but have the advantage to be non-invasive and could be performed at home. Significance: Diagnosis of imminent labor is possible by electrohysterography recording and may help in avoiding over-medication and in providing better cares to at-risk pregnant women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据