4.5 Article

PAX7 target gene repression associates with FSHD progression and pathology over 1 year

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 29, 期 13, 页码 2124-2133

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddaa079

关键词

-

资金

  1. FSHD Society [FSHS-82016-03]
  2. Foulkes Foundation Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a prevalent, inherited skeletal myopathy linked to hypomethylation of the D4Z4 macrosatellite at chromosome 4q35. This epigenetic de-repression permits expression of the transcription factor DUX4, which may drive pathology by direct activation of target genes or through inhibition of the homologous transcription factor PAX7. We demonstrated that PAX7 target gene repression is a superior biomarker of FSHD status compared with DUX4 target gene expression. However, despite importance for clinical trials, there remains no transcriptomic biomarker for FSHD progression. A recent study by Wong et al. [Longitudinal measures of RNA expression and disease activity in FSHD muscle biopsies. Hum. Mol. Genet., 29, 1030-1043] performed MRI, muscle biopsy transcriptomics and histopathology on a cohort of FSHD patients with 1-year follow-up. No significant changes in any biomarkers were reported over this time period. However, the authors did not consider PAX7 target gene repression as a marker of FSHD progression. Here we demonstrate that PAX7 target gene repression increases in these paired FSHD samples from year 1 to year 2 and is thus a marker of FSHD progression over 1 year. Moreover, we show that three validated DUX4 target gene expression biomarkers are not associated with FSHD progression over 1 year. We further confirm that PAX7 target gene repression associates with clinical correlates of FSHD disease activity, measured by MRI and histopathology. Thus, PAX7 target gene repression is a uniquely sensitive biomarker of FSHD progression and pathology, valid over a 1 year time frame, implicating its use in clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据