4.7 Article

A toolbox for brain network construction and classification (BrainNetClass)

期刊

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
卷 41, 期 10, 页码 2808-2826

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24979

关键词

brain connectome; dynamic functional connectivity; functional connectivity; machine learning; prediction; sparse representation; toolbox

资金

  1. NIH [AG041721, AG042599, EB022880]
  2. National Science Fund for Distinguished Schoalrs [61925603]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brain functional network has been increasingly used in understanding brain functions and diseases. While many network construction methods have been proposed, the progress in the field still largely relies on static pairwise Pearson's correlation-based functional network and group-level comparisons. We introduce a Brain Network Construction and Classification (BrainNetClass) toolbox to promote more advanced brain network construction methods to the filed, including some state-of-the-art methods that were recently developed to capture complex and high-order interactions among brain regions. The toolbox also integrates a well-accepted and rigorous classification framework based on brain connectome features toward individualized disease diagnosis in a hope that the advanced network modeling could boost the subsequent classification. BrainNetClass is a MATLAB-based, open-source, cross-platform toolbox with both graphical user-friendly interfaces and a command line mode targeting cognitive neuroscientists and clinicians for promoting reliability, reproducibility, and interpretability of connectome-based, computer-aided diagnosis. It generates abundant classification-related results from network presentations to contributing features that have been largely ignored by most studies to grant users the ability of evaluating the disease diagnostic model and its robustness and generalizability. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the toolbox on real resting-state functional MRI datasets. BrainNetClass (v1.0) is available at .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据