4.3 Article

An Experimental Investigation on Thermal Performance of Ultra-Thin Heat Pipes with Superhydrophilic Copper Braids

期刊

HEAT TRANSFER ENGINEERING
卷 42, 期 10, 页码 824-838

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01457632.2020.1744245

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, MOST
  2. MOST [105-2221-E-002-107-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the thermal performance of ultra-thin heat pipes with a focus on the effect of superhydrophilic wick structures, filling ratio, and sectional lengths. The experimental results showed that superhydrophilic wick structures and a filling ratio of 16.4% resulted in the best thermal performance. Additionally, the variation of sectional lengths impacted thermal resistance and heat transport capacity.
This study investigated the thermal performance of ultra-thin heat pipes (UTHPs). The total thickness of the heat pipe was 1 mm and the novel wick structure was copper braids modified to be superhydrophilic with higher capillary ability. This paper is divided into three parts, each focusing on the effect on the heat transfer performance of UTHPs, including the wettability of the wick, the filling ratio (FR), and the variation of sectional lengths. The experimental results indicate that the superhydrophilic wick structure improves the thermal performance of UTHPs, and that the FR of 16.4% results in the best thermal performance of UTHPs. Furthermore, the sectional lengths affect both the thermal resistance and the maximum heat transport capacity. The results indicate that the thermal resistance of UTHPs increases for longer adiabatic lengths but slightly decreases for longer condenser and evaporator lengths. However, because the maximum heat transport capacity is influenced by the effective length of the heat pipe, it is degraded when the adiabatic length or the condenser and evaporator length increases. An UTHP of 55-mm effective length with superhydrophilic copper braids yields thermal resistance around 0.3 /W and the best heat transport capacity of 26.3 W.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据