4.3 Article

Modified Distal Aortic Arch Occlusion During Aortic Arch Replacement

期刊

HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION
卷 29, 期 9, 页码 E245-E252

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.03.016

关键词

Modified distal aortic arch occlusion; Aortic arch replacement; Circulatory arrest; Stanford type A aortic dissection

资金

  1. Science and Technology Project of Jiangxi province [20181BBG78061]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Circulatory arrest has been identified as an independent risk factor related to postoperative mortality in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection. This study described a modified technique for distal aortic arch ocdusion that markedly shortened the circulatory arrest time. The early results are encouraging. Methods From May 2016 to September 2018, 51 patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection underwent the modified procedure for aortic arch replacement. All operations were performed via transitory circulatory arrest by clamping the distal aorta between the left common carotid artery and the left subdavian artery. The in-hospital and follow-up data of the treated patients were investigated. Results Successful repair of the involved vasculature was achieved in all patients. One (1) patient died due to postoperative aspiration and infection, and three patients required continuous renal replacement therapy due to poor preoperative renal function. The remaining patients were successfully discharged. The median average circulatory arrest time was 5.0 (3.0-6.0) minutes. No cases of tracheotomy, delayed closure, secondary thoracotomy, or other complications occurred. During the follow-up period of 2.4-18.6 months, the implanted grafts and stented elephant trunks were all fully open and not kinked. Conclusions A modified distal aortic arch occlusion can considerably shorten the duration of circulatory arrest. Current experience suggests that this approach can serve as a feasible alternative for patients during aortic arch replacement because of its simplicity and satisfactory clinical effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据