4.2 Article

Reduced exercise capacity and clinical outcomes following acute myocardial infarction

期刊

HEART AND VESSELS
卷 35, 期 8, 页码 1044-1050

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00380-020-01576-2

关键词

Exercise capacity; Acute myocardial infarction; CPX

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reduced exercise capacity is known to be an important predictor of poor prognosis and disability in patients with cardiovascular diseases and chronic heart failure, and even members of the general population. However, data about exercise capacity assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is scarce. Among 594 consecutive AMI patients who underwent primary PCI, we examined 136 patients (85.3% men, 64.9 +/- 11.9 years) who underwent CPX during hospitalization for AMI. CPX was usually performed 5 days after the onset of AMI. Reduced exercise capacity was defined as peakVO(2)<= 12. Clinical outcomes including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and hospitalization due to heart failure were followed. Among 136 patients, reduced exercise capacity (peakVO(2)<= 12) was seen in 38 patients (28%). Patients with reduced exercise capacity were older, more likely to have hypertension, and had lower renal function. In echocardiography, patients with reduced exercise capacity had higherE/e'and larger left atrial dimension. Multivariate logistic analysis showed thatE/e'(OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.31,p < 0.001) was an independent predictor of reduced exercise capacity (peakVO(2)<= 12). Median follow-up term was 12 months (IQR 9-22). The occurrence of composite endpoints of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and hospitalization due to heart failure was significantly higher in patients with peakVO(2)<= 12 than those with peakVO(2) > 12 (p < 0.001). Reduced exercise capacity following primary PCI in AMI patients is associated with diastolic dysfunction and may lead to poorer clinical outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据