4.4 Article

Long-term results of choroidal neovascularization secondary to angioid streaks

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-020-04760-2

关键词

Angioid streaks; Choroidal neovascularization; Choroidal thickness; RPE atrophy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To investigate factors contributing to the visual prognosis of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to angioid streaks (AS) in a long-term follow-up (> 5 years) study. Methods Twenty-one patients (32 eyes) affected by CNV secondary to AS were enrolled retrospectively and divided into three groups according to the period of CNV recurrence from the final treatment: group A, no recurrence for more than 12 months; group B, no recurrence for 6-12 months; and group C, no recurrence for < 6 months or ongoing. According to the above classification, we assessed best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), peau d'orange area, the number of photodynamic treatments and/or intravitreal antiangiogenic drug injections, central choroidal thickness (CCT) and central retinal thickness (CRT) using optical coherence tomography, and enlargement of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) atrophy. Results The median follow-up time was 91 months. The median logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution BCVA significantly deteriorated from 0 at baseline to 1 at final follow-up (p < 0.05). Especially, final BCVA in group A showed worst visual outcome despite lowest number of treatments. Peau d'orange areas at baseline were found in 32 eyes (100%). There were no significant differences between initial CRT and final CRT. Median CCT was significantly reduced from 188 mu m at baseline to 96 mu m at final follow-up (p < 0.05). The median number of treatments was 3.5. Enlargement of RPE atrophy at baseline was found in 31 eyes (96.8%). Conclusions Despite the regression of CNV secondary to AS following treatment, the visual prognosis was poor due to the presence of peau d'orange areas, choroidal thinning, and increased RPE atrophy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据