4.6 Article

Glacial and fluvial erosion in the Dolpo Basin, Western Nepal

期刊

GEOMORPHOLOGY
卷 354, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107033

关键词

Glacial morphology; Glacial erosion; River capture; Himalayas; Tibet; Landscape evolution

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. NSERC Undergraduate Summer Research Awards (USRA)
  3. US NSF-Tectonics Program [EAR1763432]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The landscape of Western Nepal has been dramatically shaped by tectonics and by both glacial and fluvial erosion. Here we investigate the modern geomorphic and glacial features of the Dolpo basin in northern midwestern Nepal. We analyze attributes such as glacier size, slope, aspect and toe, head and peak elevation for 446 glaciers within and around the basin, determining their relationship with basin features such as lithology, slope and precipitation. Glaciers reflect lithology and precipitation, but glacier size is strongly correlated with base-level and slope. Our data suggest that low-slope glaciers with high base-level, i.e., those that flow onto the Tibetan plateau, are forced to growlarge because they exist at or above the equilibrium-line altitude. Glaciers within the basin, particularly in thewestern part, can become dismembered on steep slopes, an effect only partly offset by precipitation. The spatial variability in regional slope and presence of a wind gap along the northern basin border suggest recent capture of the Dolpo basin. A plateau-like morphology would have thus once extended at least 45 km southward. The southward opening of the basin allowed precipitation to enter, forming glaciers along the western end of the northern basin border. Larger glaciers (resulting from high base-level) pushed the ridge southward over time through headward erosion. Our study suggests dramatic landscape reorganization in western Nepal, consistent with other recent studies suggesting a more extensive proto-Tibet. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据