4.7 Article

Dynamics of phosphorus speciation and the phoD phosphatase gene community in the rhizosphere and bulk soil along an estuarine freshwater-oligohaline gradient

期刊

GEODERMA
卷 365, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114236

关键词

Phosphorous; phoD phosphatase gene; Saltwater intrusion; Rhizosphere; Estuarine tidal marsh

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [41801062]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M630731, 2019T120556]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC0502901]
  4. European Research Council Synergy Grant [ERC-SyG-2013-610028 IMBALANCE-P]
  5. Spanish Government [CGL2016-79835-P]
  6. Catalan Government [SGR 2017-1005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estuarine tidal marshes play a key role in phosphorus (P) retention and cycling; however, they are suffering from small but significant increases in tidal saltwater intrusion. The likely impacts of these low-level saltwater intrusions on P availability and microbial activity are unclear. Here, we investigated soil P speciation, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and the phoD phosphatase gene community along a freshwater-oligohaline gradient in the Min River estuary, southeast China. The results indicated that with the transition from freshwater to oligohaline water, the levels of soil-water salinity, pH and sulfate content were greater, and ALP activity was lower, which were associated with higher concentrations of organic P, available P, aluminum-bound P, calciumbound P, and occluded P and lower levels of iron-bound P. There was a strong shift in the phoD phosphatase community composition in response to the freshwater-oligohaline gradient. Our findings showed that with the transition from freshwater to an oligohaline environment, in addition to the associated increases in salinity and soil pH and decreases in general microbial and biological activity and soil organic carbon, there is a shift in soil P toward more recalcitrant and immediately available fractions with less labile forms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据