4.7 Article

Complete characterization of the human immune cell transcriptome using accurate full-length cDNA sequencing

期刊

GENOME RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 589-601

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.257188.119

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Human Genome Research Institute/National Institute of Health Training Grant [1T32HG008345-01]
  2. Hellman Foundation
  3. National Institute of General Medical Sciences/National Institute of Health Grant [1R35GM133569-01]
  4. Santa Cruz Cancer Benefit Group

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human immune system relies on highly complex and diverse transcripts and the proteins they encode. These include transcripts encoding human leukocyte antigen (HLA) receptors as well as B cell and T cell receptors (BCR and TCR). Determining which alleles an individual possesses for each HLA gene (high-resolution HLA typing) is essential to establish donor-recipient compatibility in organ and bone marrow transplantations. In turn, the repertoires of millions of unique BCR and TCR transcripts in each individual carry a vast amount of health-relevant information. Both short-read RNA-seq-based HLA typing and BCR/TCR repertoire sequencing (AIRR-seq) currently rely on our incomplete knowledge of the genetic diversity at HLA and BCR/TCR loci. Here, we generated over 10,000,000 full-length cDNA sequences at a median accuracy of 97.9% using our nanopore sequencing-based Rolling Circle Amplification to Concatemeric Consensus (R2C2) protocol. We used this data set to (1) show that deep and accurate full-length cDNA sequencing can be used to provide isoform-level transcriptome analysis for more than 9000 loci, (2) generate accurate sequences of HLA alleles, and (3) extract detailed AIRR data for the analysis of the adaptive immune system. The HLA and AIRR analysis approaches we introduce here are untargeted and therefore do not require prior knowledge of the composition or genetic diversity of HLA and BCR/TCR loci.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据