4.7 Article

Enhanced energy-storage performance and electrocaloric effect in compositionally graded Pb(1-3x/2)LaxZr0.85Ti0.15O3 antiferroelectric thick films

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 42, 期 1, 页码 1679-1687

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.09.122

关键词

Compositionally gradient; PLZT thick films; Energy-storage performance; ECE

资金

  1. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51462027]
  3. Ministry of Sciences and Technology of China through 973-project [2014CB660811]
  4. Innovation Program of Inner Monglia University of Science and Technology [2014QNGG01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The compositionally graded multilayer Pb((1-3x/2))LaxZr0.85Ti0.15O3 (PLZT) antiferroelectric (APE) thick films were deposited on LaNiO3/Si (100) substrates by using a sol-gel method. The effect of gradient sequence on dielectric properties, energy-storage performance, and electrocaloric effect (ECE) was investigated in detail. It is found that the compositionally graded films exhibited a significant enhancement in dielectric properties, energy-storage performance and ECE, which was, in contrast to the single-composition PLZT film, contributed by the strain and the gradient of polarization near the interfaces between the adjacent layers. A recoverable energy-storage density of 44 J/cm(3) and efficiency of 71% was obtained in the up-graded PLZT APE thick film at 1950 kV/cm. A giant reversible adiabatic temperature change of Delta T=28 degrees C at room temperature at 900 kV/cm was also achieved in the up-graded film. Moreover, all the thick films displayed a small leakage current density below 10(-6) A/cm(2) at room temperature. Thus, the compositionally graded PLZT APE thick films with a large recoverable energy-storage density and a giant ECE could be a potential candidate for the applications in high energy-storage density capacitors and cooling devices. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd and Techna Group S.r.l. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据