4.2 Article

Characteristics and contents of the Master's programs in public health in Spain

期刊

GACETA SANITARIA
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 127-138

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.03.006

关键词

Public health; Training; Master's programs; Academic characteristics; Content; Competencies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compares the main academic characteristics and contents of different master's programs in public health in Spain. The results show that while there is a certain homogeneity in academic characteristics, there are significant differences in content. Standardization in mandatory content is recommended.
Objective: To compare the main academic characteristics and contents of the different master's programs in public health currently offered in Spain.Method: A systematic search has been carried out in the Register of Universities, Centers and Degrees of the Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports. The main academic characteristics and the contents (mandatory and optional) of the programs of 11 official master's degrees with the renewed accreditation in 2018 were analyzed based on the data published on the universities' web pages.Results: Most programs are 60 ECTS (European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System), face-to-face, taught in Spanish, include in their curriculum the completion of a master's thesis but not professional practices. Only contents related to statistics and basic epidemiology, and the training activity of master's thesis, are offers by all programs.Conclusions: The majority of public health master's programs in Spain shows a certain homogeneity regarding their academic characteristics, but a great heterogeneity in relation to their contents. There is also a great heterogeneity in the credits granted to the different subjects, especially optional subjects. It would be advisable to standardize a common core, especially in the mandatory contents.(c) 2020 SESPAS. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据