4.7 Article

Chloride-promoted formation of octahedral LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 crystal with greatly enhanced electrochemical performance

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 42, 期 7, 页码 9038-9045

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.02.161

关键词

Lithium ion battery; LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4; Chloride; Octahedral shape

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51304098]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20125314120004]
  3. Program for Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Education of China [IRT1250]
  4. Academician Exploration Program of Yunnan province [2013HA011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 samples are synthesized by a low-temperature solid-state method using chlorides or acetates as raw materials, and their crystal structure, size, morphology and electrochemical performance are comparatively investigated. The results show that the two samples have the same crystal structure but with different crystal size and morphology. The LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 prepared from chlorides shows relatively bigger crystals with a well-developed octahedral shape with {111} faces, while the LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 prepared from acetates displays a quasi octahedral shape whose edges and corners are not fully developed. Such a difference in crystal size and morphology leads to a big difference in their electrochemical performance, and the octahedral LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 prepared from chlorides has higher capacity, much better rate capability and cycling performance. Our results suggest that the crystal size and morphology difference of the two samples may be associated with the presence of unreacted chloride in the precursor derived from raw materials of chlorides, and the presence of chloride may effectively promote the formation of octahedral LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 crystal at low temperature via a solid-state reaction (500 degrees C in this work) (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd and Techna Group S.r.l. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据