4.7 Article

Combined treatment of electrical and ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) to improve the cold flowability of waxy crude oils

期刊

FUEL
卷 267, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117161

关键词

Waxy crude oil; Combined treatment; Electric field; EVA; Cold flowability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51534007, 51134006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flow assurance issues related to wax precipitation, are one of the most challenging problems in the pipeline transportation of waxy crude oils. Flowability of waxy oils can be improved by suitable pour point depressants (PPDs). Besides chemical treatments, exposing waxy oils to high-voltage electric fields can also significantly improve their cold flowability. However, the combined effect of electric fields and PPD on the flowability of waxy oils is not yet clear. In this investigation, the effect of the combined electrical and EVA treatment on the flow properties of a waxy crude oil was studied. It is found that the combined treatment can lead to more significant reductions in the viscosity, the yield stress and the thixotropy of waxy oils compared to oils treated solely by electric field or EVA. However, the overall improvement in the flowability achieved by the joint treatment is lower than the sum of improvements achieved by the electric field and EVA. The combined treatment outperforms the individual treatments for hours under a low shear of 10 s(-1). However, the performance cannot be preserved even for minutes under a high shear of 1200 s(-1). Reheating has a negative impact on the electrical treatment, but an intricate impact on the EVA treatment and the combined treatment. The electrical- and chemical performance both undermine upon reheating, but chemical performance can be partially recovered when reheating temperature is above the wax disappearance temperature. Microscopic observation showed that the combined treatment leads to larger size and broader size distribution of wax particles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据