4.7 Article

Behaviors of hydrogen bonds formed by lignite and aromatic solvents in direct coal liquefaction: Combination analysis of density functional theory and experimental methods

期刊

FUEL
卷 265, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117011

关键词

Hydrogen bonds; Oxygen-containing functional groups; Lignite; Direct coal liquefaction; Density functional theory

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [U1703252]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Province [U1703252]
  3. Bureau of International Cooperation, Chinese Academy of Sciences [122214KYSB20170020]
  4. Shanxi Province Science Foundation for Youths [201801D221089]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21576274]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen bonds play a crucial role in thermal conversion of low rank coal, especially direct coal liquefaction (DCL) because of their wealthy abundance and great influence on generation of light products. Relative distribution of hydrogen bonds was evaluated with in-situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transformation (DRIFT), while visualization analysis of hydrogen bonds (OH-p in particular) between coal and solvents were performed using density functional theory (DFT) and reduced density gradient (RDG) analysis. In terms of their effects, DCL experiments of demineralized Yunnan lignite (DeYN) with/without addition of benzene at 200, 250 and 300 degrees C were carried out, and oxygen-containing functional groups were investigated by solid-state C-13 NMR and in-situ DRIFT. Relative content of OH-p hydrogen bonds increased with temperature rising. Benzene is the stronger hydrogen bonds acceptor compared to tetralin (THN). Conclusions drawn from DCL experiments are consistent with DFT calculations. To be specific, benzene with mass concentration of 2% promotes cleavage of O-H bonds, carboxyl groups and the generation of aryl ether bonds, and the differences caused by benzene are intensified when DCL temperature rises.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据