4.5 Article

Individualized Template MRI Is a Valid and Reliable Alternative to Individual MRI for Spatial Tracking in Navigated TMS Studies in Healthy Subjects

期刊

FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00174

关键词

transcranial magnetic stimulation; navigation; spatial transformation; primary motor cortex; motor evoked potentials; template magnetic resonance images

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  2. Open Access Publication Fund of Charite -Universitatsmedizin Berlin
  3. DFG [BR 1691/8-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) provides significant benefits over classic TMS. Yet, the acquisition of individual structural magnetic resonance images (MRIindividual) is a time-consuming, expensive, and not feasible prerequisite in all subjects for spatial tracking and anatomical guidance in nTMS studies. We hypothesize that spatial transformation can be used to adjust MRI templates to individual head shapes (MRIwarped) and that TMS parameters do not differ between nTMS using MRI(individual)or MRIwarped. Materials and Methods: Twenty identical TMS sessions, each including four different navigation conditions, were conducted in 10 healthy subjects (one female, 27.4 +/- 3.8 years), i.e., twice per subject by two researchers to additionally assess interrater reliabilities. MRI(individual)were acquired for all subjects. MRI(warped)were obtained through the spatial transformation of a template MRI following a 5-, 9-and 36-point head surface registration (MRIwarped_5, MRIwarped_9, MRIwarped_36). Stimulation hotspot locations, resting motor threshold (RMT), 500 mu V motor threshold (500 mu V-MT), and mean absolute motor evoked potential difference (MAD) of primary motor cortex (M1) examinations were compared between nTMS using either MRI(warped)variants or MRI(individual)and non-navigated TMS. Results: M1 hotspots were spatially consistent between MRI(individual)and MRIwarped_36(insignificant deviation by 4.79 +/- 2.62 mm). MEP thresholds and variance were also equivalent between MRI(individual)and MRI(warped_36)with mean differences of RMT by -0.05 +/- 2.28% maximum stimulator output (%MSO;t((19))= -0.09,p= 0.923), 500 mu V-MT by -0.15 +/- 1.63%MSO (t((19))= -0.41,p= 0.686) and MAD by 70.5 +/- 214.38 mu V (t((19))= 1.47,p= 0.158). Intraclass correlations (ICC) of motor thresholds were between 0.88 and 0.97. Conclusions: NTMS examinations of M1 yield equivalent topographical and functional results using MRI(individual)and MRI(warped)if a sufficient number of registration points are used.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据