4.4 Article

Familial history of migraine influences habituation of visual evoked potentials

期刊

CEPHALALGIA
卷 37, 期 11, 页码 1082-1087

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0333102416673207

关键词

Migraine; visual evoked potentials; genetics

资金

  1. Seventh Framework Programme, Euroheadpain [FP7-602633]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Lack of habituation of visual evoked potentials (VEP) is a common finding in migraine patients between attacks. Previous studies have suggested an electrophysiological familial aggregation pattern associated with migraine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of a positive familial history of migraine on VEP amplitude and habituation. Methods We recorded six blocks of 100 VEP during continuous pattern-reversal stimulation in 30 patients with migraine between attacks (MO) and in 30 healthy volunteers, of whom 15 had a first-degree relative suffering from migraine (HVm) and 15 had not (HV). Results Both MO and HVm had a significant deficit of VEP habituation and similarly reduced N1-P1 first block amplitudes, compared to HV (habituation slope: MO=0.033, HVm=0.021, HV=-0.025, HV vs. MO p=0.002, HV vs. HVm p=0.036; mean N1-P1 amplitude in the first block: MO=9.08 mu V, HVm=9.29 mu V, HV=12.19 mu V. HV vs. MO p=0.041, HV vs. HVm p=0.076). The first block N1-P1 amplitude was negatively correlated with the habituation slope for both MO (=-.44, p=0.015) and HVm (=-.56, p=0.031) while no significant correlation was found in HV (=.17, p=0.53). There were no differences in VEP latencies between the groups. Conclusions Our study suggests that lack of habituation of visual evoked potentials is probably a genetically determined endophenotypic trait that is associated with both migraine and migraine susceptibility. We hypothesize that genetic diversity of populations could account for some of the discrepancies between electrophysiological studies performed in migraine and for interindividual variations among the subgroups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据