4.5 Article

DNA barcoding for identification of marine gastropod species from Hainan island, China

期刊

FISHERIES RESEARCH
卷 225, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105504

关键词

DNA barcoding; Gastropods; Hainan island; Species identification

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [201762014]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31772414]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province [AA17204080-4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Morphological identification of gastropods can be difficult considering the larva of species and high similarity among the same genera. DNA barcoding has been widely used in species identification and biodiversity research. The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of using the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene for the identification of gastropod species and to construct a reliable DNA barcoding reference database of gastropods in Hainan island, China. A total of 306 mitochondrial COI barcode sequences were obtained from 120 species, 35 families and 7 orders of gastropods. The average length of the sequence was 640 base pairs. The average genetic distances based on Kimura two parameter (K2P) within species, genera, families, orders and classes were 0.9 %, 14.7 %, 18.9 %, 24.5 % and 28.6 %, respectively. Most of the gastropod species could be identified using COI sequences. Our results confirmed that the identification method combining morphology and DNA barcode greatly improved the efficiency of species identification. In this study, we found three new record species in China, namely Semiricinula tissoti (Petit de la Saussaye, 1852), Engina alveolata (Kiener, 1836) and Wallaconchis ater (Lesson, 1831). Overall, this study revealed that the identification of gastropods by DNA barcoding is efficient, and COI sequencing technology can be used for the identification of gastropod species and thereby can be used to manage fisheries and assess biodiversity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据