4.7 Article

Activation of AMP-activated protein kinase during sepsis/inflammation improves survival by preserving cellular metabolic fitness

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 34, 期 5, 页码 7036-7057

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1096/fj.201901900R

关键词

AMPK; metabolism; mitochondria; Sirt3; tubular epithelial cell

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [1K12HL109068-02, 1K08GM117310-01A1, DK079307, HL109002]
  2. kidney imaging and cellular physiology cores of the Pittsburgh Center for Kidney Research [P30 DK079307, S10 OD021627, R01 DK075048]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose was to determine the role of AMPK activation in the renal metabolic response to sepsis, the development of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) and on survival. In a prospective experimental study, 167 10- to 12-week-old C57BL/6 mice underwent cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) and human proximal tubule epithelial cells (TEC; HK2) were exposed to inflammatory mix (IM), a combination of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1). Renal/TEC metabolic fitness was assessed by monitoring the expression of drivers of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), the rates of utilization of OXPHOS/glycolysis in response to metabolic stress, and mitochondrial function by measuring O-2 consumption rates (OCR) and the membrane potential (Delta psi(m)). Sepsis/IM resulted in AKI, increased mortality, and in renal AMPK activation 6-24 hours after CLP/IM. Pharmacologic activation of AMPK with 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide (AICAR) or metformin during sepsis improved the survival, while AMPK inhibition with Compound C increased mortality, impaired mitochondrial respiration, decreased OCR, and disrupted TEC metabolic fitness. AMPK-driven protection was associated with increased Sirt 3 expression and restoration of metabolic fitness. Renal AMPK activation in response to sepsis/IM is an adaptive mechanism that protects TEC, organs, and the host by preserving mitochondrial function and metabolic fitness likely through Sirt3 signaling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据