4.7 Article

Impacts of chemical modification on the toxicity of diverse nanocellulose materials to developing zebrafish

期刊

CELLULOSE
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 1763-1775

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-016-0947-5

关键词

Nanocellulose; Zebrafish; Surface chemistry; Nanofibers; Nanocrystals

资金

  1. National Science Foundation via the Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) Program [1040588]
  2. Murdock Charitable Trust
  3. Oregon Nanoscience and Microtechnologies Institute (ONAMI)
  4. US National Toxicology Program [11-NS11-04-M01]
  5. [ES017552-01A2]
  6. [P30ES03850]
  7. [ES0166896-01]
  8. [FA8650-05-1-15041]
  9. [P30ES000210]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellulose is an abundant and renewable resource currently being investigated for utility in nanomaterial form for various promising applications ranging from medical and pharmaceutical uses to mechanical reinforcement and biofuels. The utility of nanocellulose and wide implementation ensures increasing exposure to humans and the environment as nanocellulose-based technologies advance. Here, we investigate how differences in aspect ratio and changes to surface chemistry, as well as synthesis methods, influence the biocompatibility of nanocellulose materials using the embryonic zebrafish. Investigations into the toxicity of neutral, cationic and anionic surface functionalities revealed that surface chemistry had a minimal influence on the overall toxicity of nanocellulose materials. Higher aspect ratio cellulose nanofibers produced by mechanical homogenization were, in some cases, more toxic than other cellulose-based nanofibers or nanocrystals produced by chemical synthesis methods. Using fluorescently labeled nanocellulose we were able to show that nanocellulose uptake did occur in embryonic zebrafish during development. We conclude that the benign nature of nanocellulose materials makes them an ideal platform to systematically investigate the inherent surface features driving nanomaterial toxicity in order to create safer design principles for engineered nanoparticles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据