4.5 Review

Serious adverse effects of cannabidiol (CBD): a review of randomized controlled trials

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2020.1754793

关键词

Cannabinoids; cannabidiol; safety; serious adverse effects

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq, Brazil)
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP)
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  4. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  5. Fundacao de Apoio ao Ensino, Pesquisa e Assistencia do Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto da Universidade de Sao Paulo (FAEPA, Brazil)
  6. Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Applied Neurosciences (NAPNA), University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil (USP-SP)
  7. National Institute for Translational Medicine (INCTTM
  8. CNPq/FAPESP, Brazil)
  9. FAPESP (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo, Brazil)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Recent trials using cannabidiol (CBD) have shown that most acute and prolonged adverse effects of CBD are mild to moderate, with rare serious adverse effects (SAEs). This review focused on analyzing SAEs of CBD and their possible relation to drug-drug interactions. Areas covered: We systematically analyzed the SAEs reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving the administration of oral CBD for at least 1 week in both healthy volunteers and clinical samples. Expert opinion: SAEs related to CBD in RCT are rare and include mainly elevated transaminases, convulsion, sedation, lethargy, and upper respiratory tract infections. Elevated transaminases are related to concomitant valproate use, while sedation, lethargy, and upper respiratory tract infections are related to concomitant clobazam use. Epileptic patients should be monitored when using CBD concomitantly with these and other antiepileptic drugs for other possible drug-drug interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据