4.6 Article

Historic and modern genomes unveil a domestic introgression gradient in a wild red junglefowl population

期刊

EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 2300-2315

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eva.13023

关键词

admixture; conservation genomics; genetic swamping; phenotypic introgression; South-East Asia

资金

  1. Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority of Singapore [WBS R-154-000-692-490]
  2. National Parks Board, Singapore [WBS R-154-000-A21-490]
  3. Erasmus Mundus project EURASIACAT [552067]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The red junglefowl Gallus gallus is the ancestor of the domestic chicken and arguably the most important bird species on Earth. Continual gene flow between domestic and wild populations has compromised its gene pool, especially since the last century when human encroachment and habitat loss would have led to increased contact opportunities. We present the first combined genomic and morphological admixture assessment of a native population of red junglefowl, sampled from recolonized parts of its former range in Singapore, partly using whole genomes resequenced from dozens of individuals. Crucially, this population was genomically anchored to museum samples from adjacent Peninsular Malaysia collected similar to 110-150 years ago to infer the magnitude of modern domestic introgression across individuals. We detected a strong feral-wild genomic continuum with varying levels of domestic introgression in different subpopulations across Singapore. Using a trait scoring scheme, we determined morphological thresholds that can be used by conservation managers to successfully identify individuals with low levels of domestic introgression, and selected traits that were particularly useful for predicting domesticity in genomic profiles. Our study underscores the utility of combined genomic and morphological approaches in population management and suggests a way forward to safeguard the allelic integrity of wild red junglefowl in perpetuity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据