4.4 Article

Spin assignments for 23Mg levels and the astrophysical 22Na(p, γ)23Mg reaction

期刊

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL A
卷 56, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00106-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (MEST) [NRF-2013M7A1A1075764, NRF-2016R1A5A1013277, NRF-2019R1F1A1058370]
  2. National Nuclear Security Administration under the Stewardship Science Academic Alliances program through the U.S.DOE [DE-FG52-08NA285]
  3. Office of Nuclear Physics, Office of Science of the U.S.DOE [DE-FG02-96ER40955, DE-FG02-96ER40983]
  4. Tennessee Technological University
  5. University of Tennessee
  6. National Science Foundation [PHY-1713857]
  7. University of Notre Dame
  8. Oak Ridge National Laboratory [DE-AC-05-00OR22725]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The 22Na(p)23Mg reaction is responsible for destruction of the long-lived radionuclide 22Naproduced during nova explosions. Since the reaction proceeds through resonances from levels in 23Mg above the proton threshold at 7.581 MeV, the properties of these levels such as excitation energies, spins, and parities are crucial ingredients to determine the 22Na(p,.)23Mg reaction rate. Despite recent studies of these levels, their spins are not well constrained in many cases. We have measured the 24Mg(p, d)23Mg transfer reaction to determine spectroscopic properties of these levels at the Holifield Radioactive Ion Beam Facility at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The spin of the Ex = 7.788 MeV level in 23Mg is constrained to be J p = (3/2+, 5/2+) through the present work. The astrophysical 22Na(p,.)23Mg reaction rate at nova temperatures is updated accordingly. Nova nucleosynthesis model calculations using the newly updated 22Na(p,.)23Mg reaction rate shows that the final weighted abundance of the radionuclide 22Nais increased by42% compared to that obtained by using the previous 22Na(p)23Mg reaction rate of Sallaska et al. for a 1.35 M ONeMg white dwarf.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据