4.2 Article

Elevated THBS2, COL1A2, and SPP1 Expression Levels as Predictors of Gastric Cancer Prognosis

期刊

CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 40, 期 6, 页码 1316-1324

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000453184

关键词

Gastric cancer; Tumor invasion; Microarray; THBS2; COL1A2; SPP1

资金

  1. Jiangsu Haosen Pharmaceutical Limited by Share Ltd.
  2. Hainan Liou Pharmaceutical Limited by Share Ltd.
  3. Xuzhou Enhua Pharmaceutical Limited by Share Ltd.
  4. Shanghai Zhongxi Pharmaceutical Limited by Share Ltd.
  5. Guizhou Xinbang Pharmaceutical Limited by Share Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: Gastric cancer (GC) is an important health problem. Classification based on molecular subtypes may help to determine the prognosis of patients with GC. Tumor invasion and metastasis are important factors affecting the prognosis of cancer. We aimed to identify genes related to tumor invasion and metastasis, which may serve as indicators of good GC prognosis. Methods: Tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues were collected from 105 patients with primary GC who were treated by undergoing radical surgery. Samples were used for tissue microarray analysis. Identified genes with altered expression were further analyzed using the Gene Ontology (Go) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) databases. The expression levels of THBS2, COL1A2 and SPP1 were analyzed by RT-PCR, western blot and immunohistochemistry. The overall survival curves of patients with high and low expression of each gene of interest were plotted and compared. Results: Forty-three genes were identified. THBS2, COL1A2 and SPP1 were selected for further analysis. Altered expression levels of THBS2, COL1A2 and SPP1 in tumor tissues were confirmed. Patients with low THBS2 expression had a better prognosis; the expression of COL1A2 and SPP1 might not affect the prognosis of patients with GC. Conclusion: THBS2, but not COL1A2 and SPP1, may serve as an indicator of GC prognosis. 2016 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据