4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Watch-and-wait strategy for type A intramural haematoma and acute aortic dissection with thrombosed false lumen of the ascending aorta: a Japanese single-centre experience

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
卷 58, 期 3, 页码 590-597

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa080

关键词

Acute type A aortic dissection; Intramural haematoma; Medical treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we investigated the early and midterm outcomes of initial watch-and-wait strategy for Stanford type A intramural haematoma and acute aortic dissection with thrombosed false lumen of the ascending aorta in patients with a maximum aortic diameter of <50 mm, pain score of <3/10 and no ulcer-like projection in the ascending aorta. METHODS: Inpatient and outpatient records were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 81 patients with type A intramural haematoma and acute aortic dissection with the thrombosed false lumen of the ascending aorta between April 2011 and April 2019, a watch-and-wait strategy was selected in 46 patients. The mean age of the patients was 68 years, and 22 (48%) patients were female. Ten patients underwent emergency pericardial drainage for cardiac tamponade at the time of presentation and 8 patients underwent aortic repair during hospitalization for new ulcer-like projection, re-dissection or rupture. In-hospital mortality occurred in 2 (4%) patients. During follow-up, survival at 1 and 2 years was 95% and 92%, respectively. There was no significant difference in survival or aortic events between patients in whom the watch-and-wait strategy and emergency surgical treatment were indicated. CONCLUSIONS: The early and midterm outcomes of the initial watch-and-wait strategy were favourable for type A intramural haematoma and acute aortic dissection with the thrombosed false lumen of the ascending aorta in Japanese patients with a maximum aortic diameter of <50 mm, pain score of <3/10 and no ulcer-like projection. Further study is required to show the safety of this strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据