4.2 Article

Calsequestrin-1 Regulates Store-Operated Ca2+ Entry by Inhibiting STIM1 Aggregation

期刊

CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 38, 期 6, 页码 2183-2193

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000445574

关键词

CSQ1; STIM1; Orai1; SOCE; STIM1 Aggregation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [81370339, 81570206]
  2. Beijing Innovation Promoting Project [TJSHG201510025005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: Stromal interacting molecule-1 (STIM1) aggregation and redistribution to plasma membrane to interact with Orai1 constitute the core mechanism of store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE). Previous study has revealed that calsequestrin-1 (CSQ1) regulates SOCE in HEK293 cells through interacting with STIM1 and inhibiting STIM1/Orai1 interaction. Here, we further investigate how CSQ1/STIM1 interaction affects SOCE. Methods: Using confocal microscopy, STIM1 aggregation and co-localizations with CSQ1 or Orai1 upon Ca2+ store depletion by thapsigargin were measured and quantified by Imaris software in HeLa cells transfected with different CSQ1 mutants. The interactions of CSQ1/STIM1 and STIM1/Orai1, and internal [Ca2+ changes were detected by co-immunoprecipitation and Fura2, respectively. Results: Wt-CSQ1 overexpression significantly reduced STIM1 clustering in the perimembrane and cytosolic regions, whereas over-expression of a [C-terminal amino acid 362-396 deletion mutant (C35) did not. Consistently, a significant depression of SOCE, increased CSQ1 monomerization and CSQl/STIM1 interaction, and a reduced STIM1/Orai1 association were observed in Wt-CSQ1 but not in C35-transfected cells. Additionally, mutant lacking C-terminal AA 388-396 deletion exerted weaker potency in inhibiting STIM1 aggregation and association with Orai1 than wt-CSQ1. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that CSQ1 monomers suppress SOCE by interacting with STIM1 and attenuating STIM1 aggregation via its C-terminal amino acid 362-396. (C) 2016 The Author(s) Published by S Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据