4.2 Article

Diagnostic Potential of Differentially Expressed Homer1 and Homer2 in Ischemic Stroke

期刊

CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 39, 期 6, 页码 2353-2363

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000447927

关键词

Cerebral Infarction; Homer; Atherosclerosis; Diagnosis

资金

  1. Wuhan Science and Technology Research Program: the development of Homer ELISA kit for breast cancer detection [201260523173-2]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB720605]
  3. US-China Biomedical Cooperation Projection [81261120403]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Ischemic stroke (IS) is an extremely heterogeneous disease with variable pathogenesis. Due to the lack of early diagnostic marker, the mortality rate of IS remains high worldwide. The family of Homer plays an important role in the pathology of atherosclerotic plaque. In this study, we have investigated its expression pattern and clinical significance in IS. Methods: RT-qPCR was performed to detect the expression of Homer1, Homer2, and Homer3. Results: We found that the mRNA levels of Homer1 (p<0.001) and Homer2 (p<0.001), but not Homer3, in large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA) strokes were significantly upregulated than those in non-LAA strokes and controls. Multinomial logistic regression analyses showed that, although none of the Homer was associated with non-LAA strokes, higher Homer1 (adjusted OR=1.337, 95% CI: 1.227-1.458) and Homer2 (adjusted OR=1.099, 95% CI: 1.062-1.138) levels showed significant associations with increased odds of having LAA stroke, compared with the controls. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed that the combination of Homer1 and Homer2 had a better diagnostic accuracy to differentiate LAA strokes from non-LAA strokes and controls, and the sensitivity and specificity ratios were 80.5%/90.4% and 98.0%/70.3%, respectively. Conclusion: Our data suggested that Homer1 and Homer2 might be considered as novel diagnostic biomarkers for LAA stroke. (C) 2016 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据