4.6 Article

Temporal variability of the carbonate system and air-sea CO2 exchanges in a Mediterranean human-impacted coastal site

期刊

ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE
卷 236, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106641

关键词

Coastal biogeochemistry; CO2 fluxes; Carbonate system; North Western Mediterranean Sea; Bay of Marseille

资金

  1. French National Research Agency (ANR) [ANR-11-LABEX-0061, ANR-11-IDEX-0001-02]
  2. European FEDER Fund [1166-39417]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The temporal evolution of the carbonate system and air-sea CO2 fluxes are investigated for the first time in the Bay of Marseille (BoM - North Western Mediterranean Sea), a coastal system affected by anthropogenic forcing from the Marseille metropolis. This study presents a two-year time-series (between 2016 and 2018) of fortnightly measurements of A(T), C-T, pH and derived seawater carbonate parameters at the SOLEMIO station. On this land-ocean boundary area, no linear relationship between A(T) and salinity in surface water is observed due to sporadic intrusions of freshwater coming from the Rhone River. On an annual scale, the BoM acts as a sink of atmospheric CO2. This result is consistent with previous studies in the Mediterranean Sea. Mean daily air-sea CO2 fluxes range between 0.8 mmolC.m(-2).d(-1) and -2.2 mmolC.m(-2).d(-1) during the study period, depending on the atmospheric CO2 sampling site used for the estimates. This study shows that the pCO(2) in the surface water is predominantly driven by temperature changes, even if partially counterbalanced by biological activity. Therefore, temperature is the main contributor to the air-sea CO2 exchange variability. Mean daily Net Ecosystem Production (NEP) estimates from C-T budget shows an ecosystem in which autotrophic processes are associated with a sink of CO2. Despite some negative NEP values, the observed air-sea CO2 fluxes in the BoM are negative, suggesting that thermodynamic processes are the predominant drivers for these fluxes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据