4.4 Article

Low-fouling biomimetic membranes fabricated by direct replication of self-cleaning natural leaf

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY
卷 42, 期 23, 页码 3641-3650

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2020.1740329

关键词

Low-fouling membrane; biomimetic membrane; surface roughness; surface modification; water treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through biomimetic technique, the surface structure of nasturtium leaf was replicated on RO membrane, improving surface characteristics, enhancing hydrophilicity, and reducing fouling tendency. The replicated membranes exhibited higher pure water flux and flux recovery values, indicating lower fouling propensity.
The membrane fouling has always been a big issue for developing membrane applications. Surface morphology and roughness affect remarkably on the membrane tendency to fouling. In this study, a biomimetic technique, as a simple, cost-effective and time-saving method was employed to replicate Tropaeolum majus (nasturtium) leaf surface on the surface of a commercial thin-film composite (TFC) reverse osmosis (RO) membrane using polyethersulfone (PES) moulds. Morphology of surface and hydrophilicity of membranes were investigated by scanning electron microscope (SEM), atomic force microscope (AFM) and water contact angle measurements. AFM and SEM photos of membrane surface declared that replication of nasturtium leaf improved the surface characteristics of membranes. The average roughness of membranes heated at 130 degrees C and 150 degrees C was 81.1 and 152.4 nm, respectively. The similar measurement was lower for the virgin membrane. Also, the roughened membranes showed higher hydrophilicity than the virgin membrane. In addition, the performance of the membrane was assessed by evaluating pure water flux (PWF) and flux recovery (FR) after the filtration of whey solution as a severe foulant for membranes. The findings exhibited that the replicated membranes had higher PWF and FR values, indicating the lower fouling tendency of modified membranes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据