4.4 Article

Biosorption of Cr(VI) using coconut fibers from agro-industrial waste magnetized using magnetite nanoparticles

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY
卷 42, 期 23, 页码 3595-3606

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2020.1752812

关键词

Biosorption; hexavalent chromium; magnetite nanoparticles; coconut shell; agricultural waste

资金

  1. CNPq, Brasilia, Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetized coconut fibres obtained from agricultural waste were utilized for the biosorption of Cr(VI), showing enhanced adsorption capacity with magnetization process. Optimum biosorption was achieved at pH 2, exceeding 90% in adsorptive efficiency.
Herein, the biosorption of Cr(VI) by magnetized coconut fibres obtained from agricultural waste has been described. Magnetization was achieved by incorporating magnetite nanoparticles into the fibres by a coprecipitation reaction in alkaline media. The biosorption capacity of the fibres was evaluated by two series of experiments. In the first series, 500 mg L-1 of the biosorbent was added to a 50 mg L-1 K2Cr2O7 solution at 28 degrees C and stirred at 200 rpm and the pH was varied from 1 to 13 to determine the optimum pH value. The second series of experiments evaluated the sorption capacity of the fibres at the optimum pH, under the same agitation speed and temperature but with an adsorbate concentration of 100 mg L-1. The biosorbents were characterized using Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy, inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, dispersive X-ray fluorescence, and X-ray powder diffraction. The biosorption experiments demonstrated that the magnetization process increased the biosorption capacity of the material. Optimum biosorption occurred at pH 2, and at optimal conditions, the best adsorptive efficiency exceeded 90%, reaching a biosorption capacity of 87.38 mg g(-1) for the magnetized fibre and 23.87 mg g(-1) for the natural fibre, with an equilibrium time of less than 20 min.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据