4.7 Article

How does experience impact the adoption willingness of battery electric vehicles? The role of psychological factors

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 27, 期 20, 页码 25230-25247

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-08834-w

关键词

Battery electric vehicles; Experience; Adoption willingness; Subjective norm; Attitudes; Perceived behavioral control

资金

  1. Double First-Class Initiative Project of China University of Mining and Technology [2018WHCC05]
  2. Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China [71974190]
  3. Project of Social Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [19GLA005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Battery electric vehicles (BEV) have become the most effective and environmentally friendly means to replace internal combustion vehicles. However, given the fact that BEV are a relatively new product category, and the majority of car users have little experience of using BEV, consumers often have a misconception about BEV, and thus tend to avoid purchasing an electric vehicle. This paper aims to explore the role of customer experience and demonstrate how this experience affects the adoption willingness of BEV. Based on driving experience and the theory of planned behavior, the authors constructed a framework of influencing factors for electric vehicle adoption willingness with the incorporation of consumer experience as the antecedents of adoption willingness. Using sample data from Jiangsu province, China, our empirical analysis shows that the mean values of the subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, attitudes, and adoption willingness of experienced consumers are significantly higher than those of inexperienced consumers. Further, the adoption willingness is positively influenced by experience through direct and indirect paths, which confirms the significant mediating effects of subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and attitudes (battery life, cruising range, low noise, and low emission).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据