4.8 Article

Using Zn Isotopic Signatures for Source Identification in a Contaminated Estuary of Southern China

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 54, 期 8, 页码 5140-5149

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05955

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSERC Canada (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council)
  2. TUYF grant [19SC01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zinc isotope ratios in water and suspended particles (SP) were measured in the Pearl River Estuary (PRE), China. Site-to-site delta Zn-66 values in water varied by approximately 1.3 parts per thousand (i.e., -0.66 parts per thousand to 0.65 parts per thousand relative to IRMM-3702 in August 2017). There were larger variations in delta Zn-66 values in water collected from the east shore (i.e., -0.66 parts per thousand to 0.37 parts per thousand) of the PRE close to industrialized areas, in comparison to those from the western shore (i.e., -0.23 parts per thousand to 0.13 parts per thousand), indicating that the PRE was influenced by different Zn sources. The variations in delta Zn-66 values in water from estuarine locations were much larger than those collected from river mouths. Similarly, larger variations in delta Zn-66 values were observed in suspended particles (i.e., -1.45 parts per thousand to 0.63 parts per thousand) relative to the water. Zinc isotopic differences (i.e., Delta Zn-66 parts per thousand) between particles and water were significantly (p < 0.05) and linearly correlated with Zn concentrations in particles between 0.8 and 10 mu m in size at most of the estuary stations, suggesting that Zn partitioning between dissolved and particulate phases influences the observed differences in Zn isotope ratios. A significant (p < 0.0001) linear correlation between the predicted delta Zn-66 values (using variations in water salinities) vs observed delta Zn-66 values indicates that Zn isotope ratios in water in the PRE can be useful for predicting the mixing processes in the water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据