4.8 Article

Biogeography and Assembly of Microbial Communities in Wastewater Treatment Plants in China

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 54, 期 9, 页码 5884-5892

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b07950

关键词

-

资金

  1. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program [20161080112]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51678335]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scientific understanding of microbial biogeography and assembly is lacking for activated sludge microbial communities, even though the diversity of microbial communities in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is thought to have a direct influence on system performance. Here, utilizing large-scale 16S rRNA gene data generated from 211 activated sludge samples collected from 15 cities across China, we show activated sludge microbes, whose growth and metabolism can be regulated followed with the metabolic theory of ecology with an apparent Ea value (apparent activation energy) of 0.08 eV. WWTPs at a lower latitude tend to harbor a more diverse array of microorganisms. In agreement with the general understanding, the activated sludge microbial assembly was mainly driven by deterministic processes and the mean annual temperature was identified as the most important factor affecting the microbial community structure. The treatment process types with similar microbial growth types and functions had a distinct impact on the activated sludge microbial community structure only when WWTPs were located near each other and received similar influent. Overall, these findings provide us with a deeper understanding of activated sludge microbial communities from an ecological perspective. Moreover, these findings suggest that, for a given set of performance characteristics (e.g., combined nitrification, denitrification, and phosphorus removal), it may be difficult to employ common engineering levers to control additional aspects of community structure due to the influence of natural environmental factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据