4.7 Article

Upcycling of waste polyethylene terephthalate plastic bottles into porous carbon for CF4 adsorption

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 265, 期 PT A, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114868

关键词

PET plastic waste; CF4 adsorption; KOH activation; Porous carbon; Upcycling

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) through the Basic Science Research Program [NRF-2020R1A2C2010815]
  2. C1 Gas Refinery Program - Korean government's Ministry of Science and ICT [NRF2018M3D3A1A01055761]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermo-chemical processes for converting plastic wastes into useful materials are considered promising technologies to mitigate the environmental pollution caused by plastic wastes. In this study, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic wastes were used to develop cost-effective and value-added porous carbons; the developed porous carbons were subsequently tested for capturing CF4, a greenhouse gas with a high global-warming potential. The activation temperature was varied from 600 degrees C to 1000 degrees C and the mass ratio of KOH/carbon ranged from 1 to 3 in the preparation process and their effects on the textural properties and CF4 -capture performance of the PET plastic waste-derived porous carbons were investigated. The CF4-adsorption uptake was dictated by the specific surface area and pore volume of narrow micropores less than 0.9 nm in diameter. PET-K(2)700, which was developed by KOH activation at 700 degrees C and KOH/carbon mass ratio of 2, showed the highest CF4-adsorption uptake of 2.43 mmol g(-1) at 25 degrees C and 1 atm. Also, the CF4-adsorption data were fitted well with the Langmuir isotherm model and pseudo second-order kinetic model. The PET plastic waste-derived porous carbons exhibited a high CF4 uptake, good CF4/N-2 selectivity at relatively low CF4 pressures, easy regeneration, rapid adsorption/desorption kinetics, and excellent recyclability, which are promising for practical CF4-capture applications. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据