4.5 Review

Leptin Dysfunction and Alzheimer's Disease: Evidence from Cellular, Animal, and Human Studies

期刊

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 203-217

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10571-015-0282-7

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Amyloid; Tau; Leptin; Body weight; Metabolism

资金

  1. Leon Levy Foundation
  2. BrightFocus Foundation
  3. National Institute on Aging
  4. American Federation for Aging Research
  5. John A. Hartford Foundation
  6. Atlantic Philanthropies [K08AG051179]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is accumulating evidence from epidemiological studies that changes in body weight are associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) from mid-life obesity increasing the risk of developing AD to weight loss occurring at the earliest stages of AD. Therefore, factors that regulate body weight are likely to influence the development and progression of AD. The adipocyte-derived hormone leptin has emerged as a major regulator of body weight mainly by activating hypothalamic neural circuits. Leptin also has several pleotropic effects including regulating cognitive function and having neuroprotective effects, suggesting a potential link between leptin and AD. Here, we will examine the relationship between leptin and AD by reviewing the recent evidence from cellular and animal models to human studies. We present a model where leptin has a bidirectional role in AD. Not only can alterations in leptin levels and function worsen cognitive decline and progression of AD pathology, but AD pathology, in of itself, can disrupt leptin signaling, which together would lead to a downward spiral of progressive neurodegeneration and worsening body weight and systemic metabolic deficits. Collectively, these studies serve as a framework to highlight the importance of understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying the body weight and systemic metabolic deficits in AD, which has the potential to open new avenues that may ultimately lead to novel therapeutic targets and diagnostic tools.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据